![]() His diverse litigation practice includes representing financial institutions and FinTech companies in civil disputes, securities and bankruptcy litigation, and complex matters involving the government.Īs a former general counsel of a large bank and federal prosecutor, Matthew routinely acts as counsel in litigated disputes and internal investigations of both domestic and international matters involving, among others, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Reserve Board (FRB), Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), state attorneys general and foreign regulators. Neureiter also criticized the lawyers' "massive cut-and-paste job." They recycled claims in their lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Trump-affiliated lawyer Sidney Powell, both of whom failed in their own lawsuits challenging the election results.Matthew Biben focuses his practice on complex negotiation and litigation of disputes, including regulatory and enforcement matters on behalf of both individuals and organizations. Neureiter said Walker and Fielder acted improperly by failing to research any factual basis for their claims that the 2020 election results were rigged, and by bringing a claim in Colorado against state officials in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin. Walker were not relying on information from the named Plaintiffs to construct the suit or for any of the substantive factual allegations." ![]() Fielder, conceded at the July 16 hearing, the lawsuit was his idea," Neureiter wrote. "It must also be noted that this was not a client-driven lawsuit. The judge noted that sanctions were warranted because the attorneys did not bring the lawsuit based on the claims of the people they represented. "Albeit disorganized and fantastical, the Complaint's allegations are extraordinarily serious and, if accepted as true by large numbers of people, are the stuff of which violent insurrections are made." The lawyers' 'massive cut-and-paste job' recycled claims from other failed lawsuits "In short, this was no slip-and-fall at the local grocery store," Neureiter wrote. Neureiter's ruling criticized the attorneys in scathing terms for purporting to "represent 160 million American registered voters," seeking to nullify "actions of multiple state legislatures, municipalities, and state courts," and then demand a "nominal amount of $1,000 per registered voter" in damages, which would amount to "a figure is greater than the annual GDP of Hungary." Read more: The definitive oral history of how Trump took over the GOP, as told to us by Cruz, Rubio, and 20 more insiders Doing so without a valid legal basis or serious independent personal investigation into the facts was the height of recklessness." "The lawsuit put into or repeated into the public record highly inflammatory and damaging allegations that could have put individuals' safety in danger. "This lawsuit was filed with a woeful lack of investigation into the law and (under the circumstances) the facts," Neureiter wrote. The order does not bar them from practicing law. Fielder, to pay the opposing lawyers' expenses and fees. Reid Neureiter concludes that the lawsuit "was filed in bad faith" and orders the attorneys, Ernest J. The Wednesday ruling from US Magistrate Judge N. See more stories on Insider's business page.Ī federal judge in Colorado has sanctioned attorneys who brought a lawsuit that challenged the results of the 2020 presidential election and sought $160 billion in damages, calling their conspiratorial claims "the stuff of which violent insurrections are made." The lawyers had asked for $160 billion in damages because Joe Biden won the presidential election. He called their claims "fantastical" and "the stuff of which violent insurrections are made." Drew Angerer/Getty ImagesĪ federal judge in Colorado sanctioned two lawyers who challenged the 2020 election results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |